| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
1. Citadel name/location endpoint? - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
Great. Thank you.
- by Philip Ogtaulmolfi - at 2016.09.04 08:45:59
|
2. [Help Request] Assets and citadels - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
Blacksmoke16 wrote: The assetList api is showing corporate assets in the citadel corp hangers. However it is not showing personal assets for a character. Progress is being made i guess then. I also see them in my hangar. Could it be because ...
- by Philip Ogtaulmolfi - at 2016.09.04 08:22:57
|
3. [Help Request] Assets and citadels - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
Genesis Dextius wrote: It appears that citadel IDs are over 32 bits (which the XML API only accepts 32 bits). I can see them. itemID="1021664671710" locationID="1021564102241" typeID="3687" quantity="1" flag="115" singleton="0" That's one ...
- by Philip Ogtaulmolfi - at 2016.08.13 13:54:45
|
4. Citadels and market - cont. - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
You get the buy orders, but not the sell orders.
- by Philip Ogtaulmolfi - at 2016.08.10 21:40:37
|
5. [Help Request] Assets and citadels - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
Unles I am completely wrong, I think I am getting them. itemID="1021664671710" locationID="1021564102241" typeID="3687" quantity="1" flag="115" singleton="0" That's one Citadel at Perimeter. The flag=115 is the first corp hangar.
- by Philip Ogtaulmolfi - at 2016.07.30 14:03:13
|
6. Getting started with the EVE API - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
Hi, Maxwell: You can start here
- by Philip Ogtaulmolfi - at 2016.04.04 07:03:29
|
7. Evernus - your ultimate trade tool - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
Pete, thank you very much. I have been playing with evernus for a couple of hours and I find it really useful. I am still reading the thread, so perhaps this has been asked before. I suppose that the margin is calculated against my own buy order...
- by Philip Ogtaulmolfi - at 2016.03.18 23:42:16
|
8. EVE Profit - Revival Project - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Even if he can't read me, thank you, Serene.
- by Philip Ogtaulmolfi - at 2016.01.01 10:22:16
|
9. Sticky:Dev blog: Testing a new EVE Launcher - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
The new version of the launcher, 973625, reset my settings. All my checklist gone. Also, in the account list I can see the selected settings for a particular account no more.
- by Philip Ogtaulmolfi - at 2015.10.23 12:08:47
|
10. EVE Profit - Revival Project - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Krypt Keeper wrote: I have a quick question about merged characters I started out with three trading characters which I have merged into one virtual character. Now I have trained up another two characters is it possible to merge those two cha...
- by Philip Ogtaulmolfi - at 2015.10.06 22:01:37
|
11. EVE Profit - Revival Project - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Yea. Not working for me since yesterday.
- by Philip Ogtaulmolfi - at 2015.09.28 21:38:46
|
12. The state of Highsec - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
If you want to incentivize people to leave High Sec, just forbid ganking and wardecs. The high sec carebears will stay, whatever you do, but perhaps you will get a few of the HS gankers to grow a pair and move where people shoots back. But it is ...
- by Philip Ogtaulmolfi - at 2015.09.25 12:20:45
|
13. Sticky:Dev blog: Citadels, sieges and you v2 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Dracvlad wrote: Yes and I will tell him that I will do what I do currently with a POS, online it run some refining and then take it down again, nice gameplay that... Do you plan to lose the expensive rigs every time? Without them the refini...
- by Philip Ogtaulmolfi - at 2015.09.23 07:35:42
|
14. Sticky:Dev blog: Citadels, sieges and you v2 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Awkward Pi Duolus wrote: I have a little more faith in CCP, in that I don't expect them to dump what is comparable to player-owned stations in HS without a reason for people wanting to take them out. Otherwise, the citadel spam will be unbeara...
- by Philip Ogtaulmolfi - at 2015.09.21 21:27:34
|
15. Sticky:Dev blog: Citadels, sieges and you v2 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Artemis Ellery Sazas wrote: If citadels replace POS's, does this mean the end of passive moon goo? Not necessarily. We will have the mining array, that will allow passive mining or not, depending on what CCP decides.
- by Philip Ogtaulmolfi - at 2015.09.21 16:08:45
|
16. Sticky:Dev blog: Citadels, sieges and you v2 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Now that you won this one I suppose you will start a crusade to delete Titans from the game, because it is not fair that I cant not kill she with my 10 friends. Or even better, take out of the game everything that I can't kill 1 v 1.
- by Philip Ogtaulmolfi - at 2015.09.21 12:50:46
|
17. Sticky:Dev blog: Citadels, sieges and you v2 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Black Pedro wrote: Too bad they will never get the chance as the XL structures will never be released like this. CCP Ytterbium has practically confirmed this on reddit as I have linked twice already in this thread. If that happens it is jus...
- by Philip Ogtaulmolfi - at 2015.09.21 12:44:24
|
18. Sticky:Dev blog: Citadels, sieges and you v2 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Black Pedro wrote: No one will contest them if they are released as such. Ergo, they won't be released as such. I am not sure how many times I have to say this. Don't say that others wont do what you are unable to do.
- by Philip Ogtaulmolfi - at 2015.09.21 09:14:54
|
19. Sticky:Dev blog: Citadels, sieges and you v2 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Black Pedro wrote: Nevyn Auscent wrote: [quote=Masao Kurata] No it's not. So you are saying that it should take 30 minutes to attack any structure (with 10-20 players as the numbers show) everywhere except in highsec and low-class wormhole...
- by Philip Ogtaulmolfi - at 2015.09.21 09:11:20
|
20. Sticky:Dev blog: Citadels, sieges and you v2 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Black Pedro wrote: Circumstantial Evidence wrote: I see some fixation on "200 battleships" in recent posts. That's not a requirement. CCP's goal is no more than a half-hour of structure bashing, if the attacker brings the maximum supported D...
- by Philip Ogtaulmolfi - at 2015.09.20 08:58:33
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |